sqrt(2) bis

Let us revisit the problem of computing the value of \sqrt{2}, but this time we slightly modify our perturbative approach to improve convergence.

Previously, we expanded around x=1, which is relatively far from the true value. Instead, we now choose a better starting point.

\displaystyle x = \sqrt{2} \quad \text{Problem}

We observe that:

\displaystyle \left(\frac{3}{2}\right)^2 = \frac{9}{4} = 2.25 \quad \text{so it is close to } 2

This suggests writing:

\displaystyle x = \frac{3}{2} + \delta

The correction \delta is expected to be small, which improves the convergence of the perturbative expansion.

We now insert this into the equation:

\displaystyle x^2 = 2
\displaystyle \left(\frac{3}{2} + \delta \right)^2 = 2
\displaystyle \frac{9}{4} + 3\delta + \delta^2 = 2

Rearranging, we obtain:

\displaystyle 3\delta + \delta^2 = -\frac{1}{4}

We now introduce a perturbation parameter \epsilon:

\displaystyle 3\delta + \delta^2 = -\frac{1}{4}\varepsilon

We seek a solution of the form:

\displaystyle \delta = b_1 \varepsilon + b_2 \varepsilon^2 + b_3 \varepsilon^3 + \cdots

Substituting into the equation and expanding:

\displaystyle 3b_1\varepsilon + 3b_2\varepsilon^2 + b_1^2\varepsilon^2 + \cdots = -\frac{1}{4}\varepsilon

Matching powers of \varepsilon:

\displaystyle \varepsilon^1: \quad 3b_1 = -\frac{1}{4} \Rightarrow b_1 = -\frac{1}{12}
\displaystyle \varepsilon^2: \quad 3b_2 + b_1^2 = 0 \Rightarrow b_2 = -\frac{1}{432}

Thus:

\displaystyle \delta = -\frac{1}{12}\varepsilon - \frac{1}{432}\varepsilon^2 + \cdots

We finally obtain:

\displaystyle x = \frac{3}{2} - \frac{1}{12}\varepsilon - \frac{1}{432}\varepsilon^2 + \cdots

Setting \varepsilon = 1:

\displaystyle x \approx \frac{3}{2} - \frac{1}{12} - \frac{1}{432} = 1.41435

which is already a very good approximation of \sqrt{2} \approx 1.41421.

This example illustrates a key idea in perturbation theory:

The choice of the unperturbed problem strongly affects the convergence of the series.

By expanding around a value closer to the true solution, we obtain a much more efficient approximation with fewer terms.

Comments

Leave a comment